Wednesday 19 August 2020

Labour in Northumberland has said the Government’s new planning reforms would ‘drive a bulldozer through local councils’ and people’s rights’.

 

Cllr Allan Hepple, the Northumberland Labour Group’s shadow cabinet member for housing and planning, said: “In Northumberland, local people and some 150 town and parish councils will no longer have any say or influence on planning applications in their area through their local council. The Government has robbed them of their long-held rights.

The New Government White Paper forces 885 new homes per year on Northumberland and removes decision making from Councils leaving neighborhood planning by Town and Parish Councils abandoned and the former Tory Localism Act discarded.

Under the new plans being rolled out from the Conservative Government last week and now out to consultation, Northumberland will have to find land which will allow builders to develop areas one and a half times the size of the Town of Newbiggin by the Sea every 10 years.

Councils will not pick up any real contributions towards the building of Council Housing or help Housing Associations develop new stock in Northumberland, damaging the hopes of the young to get a safe home over their heads from a quality landlord.

The Conservative administration at County Hall scrapped the former core strategy in May 2017 to halt any development in and around Ponteland in order to maintain house prices for the wealthy. They then went on to try but fail to produce a new local plan following statements from their Leader Cllr Peter Jackson that he could have one in place in three months. Three years on and its still not ready but the work they have done dumps the majority of development smack bang in the South East of the County and the rural coalfield attempting to concrete over the area where more than 50% of the population already dwell in 4% of the County Area.


This week following criticism from Labour the Council ran out the note below.

It doesn’t help ordinary people at all!

Planning White Paper

The Government have issued a new planning White Paper last week. There are some significant and complex changes. These have been summarised below:

Substantial changes to future Local Plan. Requires a new approach to designating land. Depending on when the white paper is enacted, we will talk to PINS about implications for current work.

  • Land will have to be designated as either a growth area, renewal area or for protection. Depending on its designation, there are impacts for planning approvals.
  • May impinge on Local Plan review. We will also need to discuss the role of a new approach for the Blyth area to best support the port/energy catapult etc
  • A new interactive approach to developing the Local Plan which will include a visual and map based approach. We are already involved in a national project on this.
  • A new statutory timetable for preparing and reviewing local plans (30 months) will be introduced by the legislation which would result in significant impacts for the Council if they fail to achieve the timescales. Additional resources may be required to ensure the Council achieves the 18 -20 month timetable for preparing a plan. Threat of intervention if timescales are missed.
  • A new approach for engagement for the Local Plan’s – Government requires more engagement but to be achieved in shorter timescales. More engagement on plan making, less at application stage.
  • A new NPPF which will set out national development management policies, removing this responsibility from the Council. The Council will have potentially less opportunities to influence local policies in the area
  • Publishing new guidance to set out how new homes will be zero carbon through the introduction of efficiency standards, beyond 2025.
  • Reforming the Community Infrastructure Levy and the current system of planning obligations to a nationally set, value-based flat rate charge. Need to understand how this will impact us and if the national set tariffs could result in further viability issues above those discussed at the EIP.
  • A real positive of a standardised tariff however is that permitted development schemes will be expected to contribute towards infrastructure – where currently they don’t.
  • Council can borrow against future tariff payments to frontload infrastructure.
  • No Duty to Cooperate requirement in the future, but clearly we will want to via the North of Tyne Combined Authority.
  • Removing requirement for five year land supply. The Housing Delivery Test will be used in its place. Either can work for us
  • New Sustainable Development Test replaces existing soundness tests
  • A standardised housing required for each Local Planning Authority – this could reduce aspirations for housing delivery – we need to ensure that the government makes this a minimum
  • As anticipated, there is more emphasis on urban design.
  • More responsibility for the Council to prepare Design Code for development which will have to be actively consulted on again with the community. This is in motion.
  • A fast track system will be introduced to automatically permit proposals for high-quality developments where they reflect local character and preferences. Unclear how this will be achieved in practice.
  • Introduction of new standardised process for planning decisions and contributions . In addition, there will be the introduction of new software for making and case-managing a planning application. This will have implications for Council IT systems. We are already involved in a MHCLG national pilot on this (with Lambeth).
  • More powers for authorities to secure affordable homes on site via the new infrastructure levy.
  • In terms of development management, land identified in the local plan as:

Areas identified as Growth areas would automatically be granted outline planning permission for the principle of development. Renewal areas would have a general presumption in favour of development. Therefore, for development would be granted in one of three ways:

  • For pre-specified forms of development such as the redevelopment of certain building types, permission will be achieved via a new permission route which gives an automatic consent if the scheme meets design and other prior approval requirements.
  • For other types of development, a faster planning application process where a planning application for the development would be determined in the context of the Local Plan description, or.
  • A Local or Neighbourhood Development Order.
  • Protected areas - development proposals would come forward through planning applications being made to the local authority (except where they are subject to permitted development rights or development orders), and judged against policies set out in the National Planning Policy Framework.
  • For all types of planning applications, the time limits of eight or 13 weeks for determining an application from validation to decision should be a firm deadline – not an aspiration. There will be an automatic refund of the planning fee for the application if they fail to determine it within the time limit. This may well lead to more refusals if information is not submitted on time by applicants
  • Local planning authorities will be subject to a new performance framework which ensures continuous improvement across all planning functions from Local Plans to decision-making and enforcement – this will allow the government to intervene if problems emerge with individual authorities.
  • Support for climate change and biodiversity net gain.
  • Consulting on changes to the NPPF in the Autumn.



The paper expresses that following the consultation there will be a transition period. It acknowledges that there will be skills gaps and will add costs. It states that the cost of operating the new planning system should be principally funded by the beneficiaries of planning gain – landowners and developers – rather than the national or local taxpayer. If a new approach to development contributions is implemented, a small proportion of the income should be earmarked to local planning authorities to cover their overall planning costs, including the preparation and review of Local Plans and design codes and enforcement activities.






Notes
https://www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk/news/politics/council/concerns-over-how-planning-changes-will-affect-northumberland-2944538






Public Sector Pay Down 20% through ‘Conservative Austerity’ years yet Public Servants are expected to absorb an £81 per month drop in living standards?

  The 1997 introduction of ‘agenda for change’ in the NHS and ‘Single Status’ in Local Government was extremely progressive towards achievin...